🔐🔒🚦 Software Development: Understanding Locks, Mutexes and Semaphores
🔗 Locks, mutexes and semaphores are synchronization primitives used in concurrent programming to ensure that multiple threads or processes can safely access shared resources without causing unexpected behavior, while they share some similarities, there are also key differences between them. Let's break down each of them:
🔐 Locks
The term "lock" is generic and can refer to any mechanism used to coordinate the access to a resource. There are various types of locks, such as read-write locks, among others.
Behavior: Depending on the type of lock, its behavior can vary. For instance, a read-write lock allows multiple readers to access the resource simultaneously but ensures exclusive access for a single writer.
Ownership: Depending on the type of lock, ownership rules might apply. For example, similar to a mutex, a thread that locks a resource is typically responsible for unlocking it.
🔒 Mutexes (Mutual Exclusion Objects)
Purpose: A mutex is a specific kind of lock that is used to guarantee mutual exclusion. Only one thread can hold the mutex at a time, ensuring that the critical section of code protected by the mutex is executed by only one thread at a time.
Behavior: If a thread has acquired a mutex and another thread tries to acquire it, the second thread will block (or optionally spin) until the first thread releases the mutex.
Ownership: Mutexes have ownership, meaning only the thread that locked the mutex can unlock it.
🚦 Semaphores
Purpose: A semaphore is a synchronization primitive that controls the access to a shared resource based on a set limit or count.
Behavior: When a thread wants to access a resource, it tries to "acquire" the semaphore. If the semaphore's value is greater than zero, it is decremented, and the thread gains exclusive access to the resource. If the value is zero, the thread blocks until another thread releases the semaphore, incrementing its value.
Ownership: Unlike mutexes, semaphores generally don't have the concept of ownership. Any thread can increment or decrement the semaphore's value, regardless of which thread changed it previously.
🔑 Key differences:
🔒🔐 Mutexes and locks provide mutual exclusion, meaning only one thread can access a resource at a time.
🚦 Semaphores provide a count of the number of threads accessing a resource, allowing multiple threads to access the resource simultaneously but with limited slots.
💡 Mutexes and locks are typically used for protecting shared resources from concurrent modifications, while semaphores are used for managing shared resources based on a predefined limit or count. In practical applications, the choice between these synchronization primitives depends on the specific requirements and the nature of the shared resources in question.
Image by Freepik